
The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State
Friedrich EngelsEngels wrote this treatise in two months following Marx's death, building on Marx's notes on Lewis Morgan's anthropology. Its central claim is that monogamous marriage, private property, and the state emerged together as historical products of the transition from primitive communism to class society. The subjugation of women—'the world-historic defeat of the female sex'—coincided with the first class antagonism, as men seized control of property and inheritance. The state, Engels argues, is merely an instrument of class rule destined to wither away.
Key Details
Key Insights — Read in 10 Minutes
What is the central claim of The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State?
Engels argues that monogamous marriage, private property, and the state are historically linked products of the transition from primitive communal society to class-based civilization. Drawing on Lewis Morgan's anthropology, he contends that when men gained control over property and sought to pass it to biological heirs, they overthrew earlier maternal-descent systems and imposed monogamy on women. This created the first class antagonism—between husband and wife—which Engels identifies as the prototype for all subsequent class oppression.
What specific concept did Engels introduce with the phrase 'the world-historic defeat of the female sex'?
The phrase appears in Engels' account of the transition from pairing marriage to monogamy, which he describes as the moment when women lost their earlier social standing. Engels argues this defeat was not a natural or biological development but a consequence of economic change—specifically, the emergence of private property and the male desire to ensure inheritance by biological heirs. This formulation became foundational for socialist and Marxist feminist analyses of patriarchy as historically constructed rather than eternal.
How does Engels' account differ from Marx's own views on the family and gender?
Engels wrote this book after Marx's death, drawing on Marx's notes on Morgan but elaborating a distinct argument about gender relations. Some scholars argue Engels' treatment of women's subjugation is more systematic and central than anything Marx wrote himself. Others, like feminist theorist Kate Millett, criticized Engels for framing women's oppression primarily in economic terms, treating it as a class event rather than a total social and psychological phenomenon.
How has Engels' argument held up since its publication?
Engels' reliance on Morgan's now-discredited evolutionary schema—savagery, barbarism, civilization—has aged poorly, and anthropologists no longer accept the idea of a universal matriarchal stage. Marxist anthropologists have largely rejected the book's specific historical claims while preserving its materialist method. Critics on the left, including some Marxist anthropologists, dismiss it as 'almost completely bunk,' though others argue it remains valuable for its framing of gender oppression as economically embedded.
What is the relationship between this book and Lewis Morgan's Ancient Society?
Engels based much of his argument on Lewis Henry Morgan's 1877 anthropological study Ancient Society, which Marx had also read and annotated. Engels adopted Morgan's periodization of human development and his theory of primitive matrilineal kinship, but added his own economic analysis of how private property transformed family structures. Engels sought to rescue Morgan's work from what he saw as a bourgeois 'wall of silence,' though contemporary anthropology has since rejected Morgan's evolutionary framework.
Why was The Origin of the Family published in Zurich rather than Germany?
The book was first published in October 1884 in Hottingen-Zürich, Switzerland, rather than Germany. Bismarck's Anti-Socialist Law, in force from 1878 to 1890, had suppressed socialist publications and organizations within Germany. Engels wrote the manuscript between late March and May 1884, and the Swiss location allowed the work to be printed and distributed without immediate censorship. An English translation did not appear until 1902.
Show 2 more insights
What does Engels mean when he says the state will 'wither away'?
Engels concludes that the state emerged as an instrument for maintaining class rule and private property, not as a neutral arbiter of social interests. Since the state's existence depends on class antagonisms, Engels argues that once classes are abolished through revolution and the means of production are socially owned, the state will lose its function and gradually disappear. He predicts it will be placed 'in the museum of antiquity, by the side of the spinning-wheel and the bronze axe.'
How did Engels' later work on this topic differ from the 1884 edition?
Engels prepared a fourth edition in 1891, incorporating new anthropological research, including work by Russian historian Maxim Kovalevsky. He added material and revised some claims in light of subsequent scholarship. This fourth edition became the standard text, and later translations generally follow it. The revisions show Engels engaging seriously with new evidence, though he retained the book's fundamental argument about the economic origins of monogamy and the state.
Wealthy Psyche is an intellectual archive. We do not host, distribute, or sell book copies — physical or digital. We provide structured knowledge to help you think better, faster.





