Wealthy Psyche

Wealthy Psyche

Decoding the mind

Behemoth

Behemoth

Thomas HobbesThomas Hobbes

Behemoth is Hobbes's dialogue-form history of the English Civil War, written after Leviathan and applying its analytical framework to the events of 1640–1660. The work's central argument is that the war was caused not by economic grievance or constitutional dispute but by the corrosive influence of seditious opinions—particularly religious doctrines that claimed a covenant with God independent of the civil sovereign. Hobbes shows that societies founded on authoritative opinion rather than sovereign command inevitably degenerate into civil strife, because intellectual vainglory makes men willing to persecute others for the superiority of their own beliefs.

Key Details

AuthorThomas Hobbes
CategoryPolitics
Sub CategoryPolitical Philosophy
PriceFree
LanguageEnglish
Total Pages—
Published—
FormatDigital Report

Key Insights — Read in 10 Minutes

✦

What is the central claim of Behemoth, and what does it reject?

Behemoth argues that the English Civil War was caused principally by seditious opinions—especially religious doctrines claiming a covenant with God that superseded obedience to the sovereign. Hobbes rejects explanations centered on economic grievance, constitutional principle, or the slow escalation of legitimate demands. As one scholarly analysis puts it, Behemoth shows that societies like seventeenth-century England inevitably degenerate into civil war because they are founded on authoritative opinion rather than sovereign command . The claim that there is a single authoritative definition of rightness not chosen by humans is an illusion of 'intellectual vainglory' that produces persecution and strife.

✦

What specific concept does Behemoth introduce or exemplify, and where is it used today?

Behemoth exemplifies Hobbes's theory that 'the power of the mighty hath no foundation but in the opinion and belief of the people' . This is his psychological theory of political authority: coercion matters less than captivation of the mind. Modern students of Hobbes use Behemoth to correct the persistent misreading that he saw humans as motivated solely by self-preservation. Stephen Holmes notes that the work 'shows more vividly than any of Hobbes's other works the importance of religion in his theories of human nature and behavior' . The concept remains central to scholarship on the relationship between belief, authority, and political stability.

✦

How does Behemoth differ from Leviathan?

Leviathan presents an analytical framework for political authority; Behemoth applies that framework to a specific historical case, the English Civil War. Leviathan is an abstract reconstruction of sovereignty from first principles; Behemoth is a dialogue between a teacher and pupil examining actual events from 1640 to 1660 . Leviathan argues for the sovereign's necessity; Behemoth shows what happens when that necessity is denied—the very worst abuses of government come to pass. Where Leviathan depicts an ideal political world, Behemoth is a contrasting treatise on its collapse.

✦

Why was Behemoth not published during Hobbes's lifetime?

Hobbes completed Behemoth around 1668 and presented it to Charles II, hoping to publish it. The king read it, recognized the correctness of its account, but flatly refused to license publication, fearing the book would not be well received and hoping Hobbes would avoid further scandal . Despite Hobbes's request to his publisher 'not to meddle in the business,' unauthorized editions were pirated and printed in Europe during the 1670s. Hobbes complained to John Aubrey that the book 'is come abroad, and I am sorry for it' . The first official edition appeared in 1679, the year of his death.

✦

How does Behemoth's argument relate to Hobbes's defense of absolutism?

Behemoth provides the clearest statement of the problem Hobbes's political science was designed to solve. By showing that societies founded on authoritative opinion inevitably collapse into civil war, the work illuminates why Hobbes thought absolute sovereignty was necessary . The argument has led some scholars to conclude that Hobbes was 'not a precursor of totalitarianism but a founder of liberalism'—his absolutism is a remedy for the chaos that follows when private judgment claims authority over public peace. The sovereign's absolute power is justified not as an end in itself but as the only barrier against Behemoth.

ⓘ

Wealthy Psyche is an intellectual archive. We do not host, distribute, or sell book copies — physical or digital. We provide structured knowledge to help you think better, faster.

© 2026 Wealthy Psyche. All rights reserved.

Made with wisdom